Hillary Clinton has been the beneficiary of so much leeway by her party.First she has a former Campaign Manager as DNC Party Chair who instead of being neutral was actively working to give every advantage to Hillary throughout Primaries. Only because of WikiLeaks, has Debbie Wasserman Schulz been finally ousted from her post. Likewise early in the primaries Hillary promised to release the Goldman Sachs speeches which netted her nearly $700,000- and they have not been disclosed nor any of the details of her 92 other speeches in two years between 2013 and 2015 in which Hillary earned $21.6million including absolute privacy of speech details and huge added staff percs. her royal treatment at these presentations is deeply entrencehed 1% behavior when the country is looking for more fairness for the middle class.
Finally, almost the complete Democratic establishment early on endorsed Hillary as evidenced by her sweeping 85% of those super delegates in May of 2015 before the Democratic primary.even got started. Hillary has always had a historically high untrustworthy rating. In mid July, Hillary’s Untrustworthy rating reached a new high of 67% after FBI Director Comey straightened her record on what she said and did about State Department emails. Now, with the Wkileaks DNC revelations, her ufavorable and untrustworthy ratings will surely rise:
Therefore, the question is why has the Democratic establishment stood with Hillary despite her declining favorability and trustworthy numbers since 2014? Ask the Democratic Super-delegates, California Governor Jerry Brown, Senator Elizabeth Warren and President Barack Obama why they chose to encumber their party with such an overwhelmingly unfavorable and distrusted albatross of a Presidential candidate? Did they not see the consequences of ignoring the beaten-down Middle Class in the Brexit vote in England?